Advances AAHA's mission and 2031 strategy while strengthening accreditation value.
1: weak connection · 5: credible contribution · 10: material mission + accreditation advancementDecision architecture
Decision Criteria Weight Controller
Choose a stakeholder scenario, include or exclude criteria, and refine the active model.
Weighting scenario
Stakeholder weighting scenario
Choose LCG, AAHA All Respondents, AAHA Board, or AAHA Staff / SLT.
Tests the strength, urgency, and addressable scale of the underlying need.
1: unvalidated · 5: credible moderate need · 10: urgent validated prizeMeasures AAHA's right to win and positive impact on trust, authority, and reputation.
1: commodity / risk · 5: credible differentiation · 10: defensible trusted advantageTests fit with AAHA's operating model, capacity, people, data, processes, and capabilities.
1: disruptive gaps · 5: manageable investment · 10: readily executableCombines time to credible launch with legal, capital, data, technology, and adoption barriers.
1: >24 months / barriers · 5: 9–18 months · 10: <6 months / mitigatedAssesses whether legal, clinical, privacy, sponsor, security, regulatory, and ethical risks are controllable.
1: unacceptable risk · 5: manageable controls · 10: proven low-risk modelDelivers incremental value to members, hospitals, teams, pet owners, or other priority stakeholders.
1: little value · 5: meaningful segment value · 10: broad differentiated valueAssesses repeatable revenue and sustainable economics after implementation.
1: unattractive · 5: plausible break-even · 10: durable contribution economicsCaptures multi-year option value, recurring value, platforms, and institutional capability.
1: short-lived · 5: useful multi-year value · 10: foundational portfolio advantageMeasures the ability to grow reach through reusable assets without proportional cost.
1: bespoke · 5: repeatable with constraints · 10: highly scalable + reusableTests partner availability, capability, willingness, incentives, and delivery support.
1: no willing partners · 5: support needs development · 10: committed capable partnersTests the ability to define, collect, interpret, and act on timely success measures.
1: unobservable · 5: reasonable proxies · 10: direct decision-useful KPIsCanary yellow = human input
Active weight profile
Each axis re-normalizes to 50% after exclusions.
No unsaved weighting changes.
LCG-only working surface
Differentiation Voting Workspace
Canary-yellow controls are internal scoring inputs. The client-facing Workshop Story excludes these editable judgments. Source-photo reconstruction preserves sticker team and stakeholder corner as separate dimensions.
- AAHA votes shown
- 54
- LCG selections
- 0
- Shared priorities
- 0